Federica Urgesi vs Ipek Oz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Sep at 10:41 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Urgesi vs I. Oz

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

TUR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Urgesi 1 - 0 Oz
They have played 3 sets in total, with Federica Urgesi winning 2 and Ipek Oz winning 1. The last match between Federica Urgesi and Ipek Oz was at the Lexus Tolentino Open - Tolentino, 14-09-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Federica Urgesi getting the victory 6-3 1-6 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Urgesi | 1 |
Oz | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Lexus Tolentino Open - Tolentino(09-14-25)
F. Urgesi vs I. Oz H2H Profile
F. Urgesi vs I. Oz Match Preview:
- Second serve proficiency shows Oz winning 42.96% of points compared to Urgesi's 37.64% in recent form. Could this give Oz a slight edge in service games?
- In return games, Urgesi appears stronger, claiming 53.12% of second serve return points versus Oz's 50.65%. Will this ability to break serve tip the scales in Urgesi's favor?
- Urgesi also holds a slight lead in first serve return efficiency, with stats at 38.03% opposed to Oz's 37.39%, indicating a competitive edge.
- When under pressure, Oz excels in saving breakpoints at a rate of 54.1%, compared to Urgesi's 47.25%. Does this indicate a stronger mental fortitude for Oz?
- Looking at yearly match success rates, Urgesi has a better record, winning 55.88% of matches, while Oz has secured 43.64%.
- Surface preferences highlight Oz's best performances on clay with a 57% win rate, whereas Urgesi performs best on indoor hard surfaces at 63%.
- Both players have participated largely in Challengers/ITF tournaments, yet Urgesi insists on a higher win rate, 56.92% as opposed to Oz's 44.44%.
- Oz typically competes against tougher opponents, facing a higher average rank of 309.98 compared to Urgesi's 426.29. Could this experience against stronger competition fortify Oz's game?
- In deciding sets, Urgesi demonstrates stronger resilience, winning 53% of such encounters, while Oz secures 39%, giving Urgesi an edge in close matches.
- Regarding breakpoint conversion, Urgesi converts 43.63% of chances, surpassing Oz's 34.82%. Does Urgesi's efficiency in crucial moments make them a formidable opponent?
Editorial Prediction (September 14, 2025, UTC):
Examining the recent performance data, Urgesi generally boasts superior return statistics, proving particularly effective against opponents' serves. This could potentially disrupt Oz's service games and create opportunities for break points.
Moreover, Urgesi exhibits greater consistency in match outcomes with a higher percentage of matches won in the past year, as well as showing a marked advantage in breakpoint conversion and deciding set wins.
While Oz demonstrates better numbers in handling breakpoints and playing against higher-caliber opposition, Urgesi's overall stability and effectiveness in high-pressure situations give them a potential upper hand in the upcoming match.
Taking these factors into account, Urgesi seems more likely to emerge victorious in this tightly poised contest.
Federica Urgesi vs Ipek Oz Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Urgesi vs I. Oz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
13 | Games Won | 11 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
2:2:8 | Average Match Time | 2:2:8 |
66% (54/82) | 1st Serve % | 67% (50/75) |
59% (32/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (24/50) |
32% (9/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (9/25) |
70% (7/10) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (6/9) |
56% (42/75) | Return Points Win % | 50% (41/82) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Urgesi Recent Matches Played
I. Oz Recent Matches Played

F. Urgesi vs I. Oz Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
50.32% (78/77) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.73% (281/242) |
49.73% (184/186) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.93% (645/551) |
50.41% (1778/1749) | Games Win/Loss | 51.88% (5550/5147) |
42.86% (3/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 41.86% (36/50) |
47.27% (52/58) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.88% (215/163) |
60.53% (23/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.94% (27/26) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (3/3) |
0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
212 | Aces Total | 526 |
0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
500 | Total Double Faults | 741 |
1:42:30 | Average Match Time | 1:30:3 |
479.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 459.75 |
63% (6309/9977) | 1st Serve % | 71% (21528/30331) |
59% (3731/6309) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (12547/21528) |
43% (1587/3668) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4367/8803) |
48% (619/1299) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1871/3928) |
47% (4694/10037) | Return Points Win % | 46% (14177/30975) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 22.22% (2/7) |
0.00% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 66.67% (6/3) |
0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (7/14) |
48.76% (59/62) | Challenger W/L | 53.85% (161/138) |
61.29% (19/12) | Futures W/L | 58.33% (105/75) |
50% (77/153) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (274/510) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
43% (13/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (39/92) |
53% (33/62) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (71/159) |
81% (78/63) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (298/246) |
19% (78/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (298/51) |
18% (77/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (225/35) |